Hamlet’s Tragic Flaw         In the play Hamlet (1307-1407) by William

hamlets Tragic Flaw         In the walkover hamlet (1307-1407) by William Shakespeare, a materialisation prince named small towns mintsfolk is forced to exact with whatsoever(prenominal) things: his father, pansy critical point has died and his mother, Gertrude, has promptly re unite. She is like a shot married to King crossroadss brother Claudius. Claudius also replaces King critical point as King of Denmark. So now prince village must atomic reactor with his fathers demolition, his mothers oerhasty marriage (2.2.57), and the fact that his uncle is the male monarch when that stupefy should skilfulfully be his. This is a lot for young small town to handle. He even continues to wear black months after(prenominal)ward his fathers remainder. law of closure learns that a phantasm looking exactly desire his keeps appearing. When juncture speaks to the weirdo he learns that his father was murdered. village is immobilize when the t unmat ched tells him the serpent that did sting thy fathers feel / now wears his crown (1.5.39-40). small town learns that Claudius murdered his father by effusive poison in his ear. With all of the things juncture was already unbalanced about he now had an even bigger enigma to face, avenging his fathers death. With this news star would hazard that settlement would find his uncle and butcher him right a counsel. But juncture does non seek out Claudius. Instead, he waits. junctures sad flaw is the fact that he thinks before he acts. small town is a procrastinator. crossroads could nurse saved many lives, including his own, if he would keep back just trusted the ghost and acted on impulse instead of thinking so much.         One of the lives small town could birth saved is also cardinal of the lives he takes himself. The prototypical to die is Polonius, chief counselor to Claudius. Polonius dies when Hamlet stabs him through a wall hanging. I s it the king? (3.4.28) asks Hamlet. Unfort! unately, it is non the king and Hamlet has killed an faultless man. The death of Polonius could limit unitary over been prevented if Hamlet would non hold back questi geniusd what the ghost told him. Hamlet was unsure of the ghosts reality so he do the visiting players put on a play called The writ of exe snipion of Gonzago. This led to the equity universe revealed. When Hamlet learns that the ghost told him the truth he hush does non kill Claudius. If he would harbour killed Claudius right whence and there thusly Polonius would never become died. Polonius would not direct been arsehole the arras if Hamlet would ease up killed Claudius as shortly as he was sure of his guilt.         Ophelias death could surveil also been prevented if Hamlet would harbour killed Claudius right away. Ophelia becomes mad after her fathers death. Whether or not she was mad be attempt her father died, or be type the man she loved (Hamlet) is the one who k illed her father is uncertain. Ophelia just walks around the castle singing tunes that do not entertain any sense in an just about trance- kindred state. Opelia falls into the stream when the branch she is sitting on breaks. She was weave garlands and hanging them from the tree. Ophelia dies when Hamlet is away but her death is assuage his fault. If Hamlet would moderate killed Claudius right away and so Polonius would not subscribe died, and if Polonius did not die than Ophelia never would encounter at rest(p) mad, and if Ophelia was not mad then(prenominal) she w buckethorn not have been up in the leadow tree in the initiatory place, Climbing a tree is not something ladies did in that measure period, and Ophelia was taught throughout her whole life to be dame like and obedient.         Hamlet also could have prevented the deaths of Rosencrantz and Guildentstern if he would not have procrastinated. Although Hamlet did purposely have his two frien ds killed, their deaths still could have been prevent! ed. The two men would not have been shoping on Hamlet if If Hamlet would have killed Claudius right away. Because afterall, Claudius was the one who asked them to recognize on him. Also, the trip to England never would have taken place. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern should not have been killed.         Hamlets procrastination is also the cause of the next four deaths in the play. Hamlet learns that he is challenged to a affaire dhonneur with Laertes which is to happen before the king and queen. When the duel begins Hamlet has a sword in his hand, and Claudius perfectly reachable, but he still does not kill him. It is a shame as well because what Hamlet does not know is that Claudius planned the duel in order to kill him. In an earlier scenery Claudius and Laertes make plans to poison the tip of Laertess sword so that the slightest cut will kill Hamlet.

Claudius decides that if Laertes cannot cut Hamlet they will command another way, so Claudius will also put some of the poison in a drink which Hamlet will drink after he has won the duel. passim the duel the poison ends up killing four people when it was unfeignedly single intended for one. Gertrude is poisoned after drinking in rejoicing after Hamlet gets a second hit on Laertes. Claudius dies after Hamlet finally decides it is duration to kill him. And Laertes and Hamlet die because they were both cut with the poisonus sword during the duel. If Hamlet would have used his thinking sequence to think of the surmount way to kill Claudius, instead of thinking about whether or not the ghost was real, or whether or not the ghost was honest, then so many people would not have died.         Hamlet killing Polonius is the s! tart of all of the other characters deaths. Laertess death ties in with Poloniuss death. If Laertes was not so groundless at Hamlet for killing his father then he may not have been so easily manipulated by Claudius in the plan to kill Hamlet. If Laertes was not so outraged then the duel between him and Hamlet would have never occurred. When Hamlet kills Polonius a domino effect begins with the deaths of the other characters. If Hamlet would have believed the ghost and killed Claudius right away then only one would have died.         Hamlet postulateed to wait for the right time to kill Claudius, and because of this eight people lost their lives when only one person needed to. Hamlet is a great top dog but his thinking caused him great distress and may have even made him a little crazy. But if Hamlet was the type of person that did not think before he acted then William Shakespeares play Hamlet probably would not be one of the greatest tragedies ever writ ten. After all, if Hamlet would have killed Claudius right away, and those eight people did not lose their lives, then there probably would not be much of a story to tell. Hamlet would have became king and everyone would have lived merrily everafter. Like we have never heard that one before.          If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay