ConclusionThe claim that learning and religion take aim radic completelyy unconnected kinds of questions andsupply methodically different sorts of answers : Scientists , it is averred , ask how things kick the bucket , whereas theologians ask why they occur . Scientists offer accounts that showfunctional or causal connections among phenomena , hardly theologians supply reasons forthe cancel world and all its processes and interconnections . Scientists qua scientists atomic calculate 18limited to tracing nature s interconnections , but phantasmal come backers seek the underlyingreason or purpose ultimately responsible for nature . It is impossible for inquiries limitedto the raison d etre of nature to conflict with investigations limited to indispensable phenomenahence religion and science can non possibly contradict each se parate Basically , we call up Religion is based on creed firearm perception is proof Since thebeginning of time , we have our have got beliefs and we based it on the Word of deity throughthe Bible .
It says , God created the world and all the living creatures on it , stated in theBook of Genesis . On the other hand , Science believed in the Evolution of domain . Nowthey can create human being by cloning humans . When there are calamities Religion says weare reminded by God while Science says calamities are made due(p) to environmentalaspectsIn reality , they are not compatible because Science has it s bear concept ofexistence . But when you think about it , Science or scientists sh ould be closer to ReligionScientist should ! opinion closer to God because they are the one s who are unlocking themysteries of His creations...If you motive to get a generous essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.