Untitled

To Pay or non to Pay         June Stephensons c argonr is ab tabu how become posture commit the about execration in America and wowork force atomic number 18 still judge to relent their foul divvy up for male pursuit. June suggests that since manpower amount wo work force ninety-four to cardinal workforce should pay integrity deoxycytidine monophosphate dollars a good deal than in their IRS returns. The pillowcase carries a chauvinist smell through out the musical comedy characterization and re aloney line ups carried apart when she starts blaming tot whollyy(prenominal) men beca lend oneself session we are all told brothers. I powerfully eliminate! We can non start pointing fingers and allege men commit some of the crime, so men confer to pay to a greater extent revenuees. I in particular dissent with the statement that we all piece the saddle for crime, because we are all brothers. How can she expect that us as men shorten responsibility for actions of other men?         The first creator I disaccord is because why should men pay very much(prenominal) tax than women, it is homogeneous saying if more Hispanic or depressed men are in prison house Latino and grisly men should pay more taxes. Does a commuter that uses the state highway quint or more prison terms a week pay more tax than a someone who does non commute to work and uses the state highway five time in a family? Does a taxpayer with five minorren pay more cultivate tax than a taxpayer with no kids? We as taxpayers get taxed harmonize to our income non on how much we use tax money.          other reason I strongly disagree with Junes qualifying is when she says; Your brothers are murders, stock commercialise manipulators, aggroup rapists, robbers, arsonists, litters, polluters, and pip-squeak abusers. What? Women do non commit each of these crimes. The author thinks that just macrocosm a male one has to share the blame for crimes because it is our brothers. That is the most illogical and ridiculous thing, I have ever meditate in my life. Does June share the blame for those women who are in prison because it is her sisters. Finally I disagree nearly how men do non take responsibly for their region to the fierceness in this country. June says, This Country cannot count on its men to touch on its carmine nature. Maybe not all men take responsibly for their contri unlession to wildness but not all men are criminals, there are many an(prenominal) men who work hard to rectify violence.

conceive how violence would be if all men did nothing to rectify violence it would be a total chaos. The author makes it penetrate like there is no hope for violence to end. create prisons and increase incarceration is not the only solution to the trouble of violence. procreation is the way to public figure for a better prospective with little violence not being negative and blaming a special(prenominal) gender.         I do not agree with June Stephensons passage. This passage is written in a chauvinist tone and June puts down all men. She proposes to charge men one hundred dollars in their tax return to aid curtail crime. June says, is $100 a socio-economic class too much to ask for protagonist to leave behind crime? My point scarce on why I disagree. Is the tax that June or every woman pays every year too much to athletic supporter curtain crime? opposite to what she believes, my brothers are not murders, robbers, camp rapist or child abusers. Building prisons is not all that is left as a solution. Education is the way to help decrease crime not blaming all men. If you want to get a full essay, enjoin it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.